Cara N. LoveEcology and Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton University

Long-term impacts of living in Chernobyl

How four decades of chronic radiation are shaping the health, immunity and genomes of Chernobyl’s wildlife.

See selected papers
Wolves, Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
Abandoned brick house overgrown by birch treesChernobyl Exclusion Zone

Chernobyl’s legacy

To this day, Chernobyl is one of the most disastrous radioactive accidents in history and the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone remains one of the most radioactive environments worldwide. Our team seeks to determine the effects of long-term radiation exposure, from characterizing chronic dose, to molecular and ecosystem level responses.

1986Year of the reactor explosion
50 millionCuries of radioactive material released
200,000+People evacuated
4,200 km²Exclusion zone created
Map of radiation contamination levels across Belarus, Ukraine and RussiaRadiation contamination levels across Europe (Atlas of Current and Predicted Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident on the Affected Territories of Russia and Belarus, 2009)

The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone

The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) was established around the most highly contaminated regions. Radionuclides including cesium-137 and strontium-90, with half-lives measured in decades, remain embedded in the soil, vegetation, and food webs of the surrounding landscape.

Scientists still don’t fully agree on what this long-term contamination does to living things. As nuclear power grows around the world, and with Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile Island as reminders of what can go wrong, it is urgent to understand how low levels of radiation over many years affect animals and people. Without that knowledge, it is impossible to plan how to protect the wildlife and people who live on contaminated land.

Przewalski’s horses sheltering in an abandoned buildingPrzewalski’s horses
Herd of Eurasian bison at the edge of a birch forestEurasian bison

Wildlife in Chernobyl

Since the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone was established, the surrounding landscape has remained abandoned and largely devoid of humans. Wildlife including Eurasian lynx, Przewalski’s horses, bison, raccoon dogs, fire-bellied toads, and wolves now roam freely through abandoned towns and regrowing forest.

A pack of gray wolves on rocksGray wolves

Wolves of the Exclusion Zone

Gray wolf population densities within the exclusion zone are estimated at up to seven times higher than in surrounding protected reserves. This suggests that the exclusion of human disturbance may be an integral part of species’ use of the zone, and may interact with radiation responses for some species.

Whether these populations are merely persisting, or are undergoing measurable adaptive evolution in response to chronic radiation stress, is a central question driving this research.

How much radiation are they exposed to?

Radiation levels vary a lot from place to place, so each animal’s dose depends on where it goes. We deployed unique GPS collars that recorded both where they were and how much radiation they were exposed to, in real time.

Wolf movement through a radioactive environment
Low doseHigh dose
Each wolf interacts with the landscape differently and experiences its own dose (illustration)
Field team fitting a GPS collar on a sedated wolfMonitoring a collared wolf in the field

What does a lifetime of radiation do to the body?

Radiation can damage DNA, interfere with the body’s ability to repair itself and throw the immune system off balance. But we still know little about what happens when animals live with lower levels of radiation for their whole lives, as they do at Chernobyl.

Using tests of overall health, cancer markers and the immune system, our research looks at what constant radiation does to wild animals over their whole lives, and across generations.

Two gray wolves in snowGray wolves in the CEZ - Photo: Dmitry Shamovich

What can we learn from the genomic architecture of populations experiencing multigenerational radiation exposure?

We utilize genomic and transcriptomic techniques to examine this question from many angles. Is there evidence that chronic radiation exposure is acting as a selective force on these populations? Does the CEZ act as a barrier to gene flow? Is there evidence that genetic variation within Chernobyl populations allows for increased resilience to radiation exposure?

Raccoon dog beside a young pine in the Exclusion Zone
Human health

What this could mean for human health and cancer research

We are finding that the biological challenges faced by Chernobyl wildlife as a result of radiation exposure, are not unlike those confronted by astronauts, or human populations living in proximity to contaminated environments.

Working with university and industry cancer researchers, we are asking whether what helps Chernobyl’s animals cope could point to new ways to treat or protect people.

Are these populations merely persisting, or are they adapting, and is there a cost?

Selected publications from this project

All publications →
2026Ecological nuance and comparative parasitology of sympatric canids in the Chornobyl Exclusion ZoneInternational Journal of Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife2026Signatures of radiation-induced stress and putative selection on immune targets in Chornobyl wolvesMolecular Ecology2024Fundamentals of wildlife dosimetry and lessons learned from a decade of measuring external dose rates in the fieldJournal of Environmental Radioactivity2024Polygenic adaptation and co-regulatory dynamics in Chernobyl wolves: unveiling immune and oncogenic stress interactions with implications for human cancer resilienceCancer Research · conference abstract2020Integration of ecosystem science into radioecology: a consensus perspectiveScience of the Total Environment2019GPS-coupled contaminant monitors on free-ranging Chernobyl wolves challenge a fundamental assumption in exposure assessmentsEnvironment International2019Efficiency and composition of vertebrate scavengers at the land-water interface in the Chernobyl Exclusion ZoneFood Webs2018Evidence of long-distance dispersal of a gray wolf from the Chernobyl Exclusion ZoneEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research2017If you do not shoot: the number, territorial structure and predation of the wolf in the winter period 2016–2017 in the Chernobyl zoneProceedings, Modern Problems of Hunting and Preservation of Biodiversity2016Where the wild things are: influence of radiation on the distribution of mammalian species within the Chernobyl Exclusion ZoneFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Collaborators

Collaborations

This project is part of a large collaborative group across disciplines. Some of the closest collaborators are listed below, but this list is ever growing. We also have numerous funding sources, past and present, that have contributed to this work. 

Campbell-Staton Lab Princeton University
Lance Lab Savannah River Ecology Lab, UGA
Beasley Lab Savannah River Ecology Lab, UGA
Dr. Tom HintonFukushima University
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Dr. Valery DombrovskiNational Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Dr. Dmitry Shamovich
Collaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logoCollaborating institution logo

Forty years on, the Exclusion Zone is a landscape people left behind and nature moved in.

An abandoned dentist’s chair beside peeling blue walls
An abandoned dentist’s chair
A tree growing up through the floor of an abandoned building
A tree growing through an abandoned building · photo: C. N. Love
Schoolbooks left behind
Schoolbooks
Collapsing farmstead
Collapsing farmstead

More featured projects